I’ve been concerned about this for a while – and recently I guess certain elements and the stars aligning made me realise that in fact we all must be careful about what we do in the fast moving social media space. We’ve all read and heard stories of potential employers checking out peoples Facebook to see what they get up to in their private life is not only a violation and invasion of privacy – but what does it matter what they get up to in their own time. However lest address that last point “violation and invasion of privacy “ in actual fact – it probably isn't – if someone has a Facebook / MySpace / Bebo or whatever account and they have it open to the world to see – then at what stage is it violation of privacy laws vs a nosy and snooping employer? Or is it just a curious employer that is genuinely looking to see what kind of person the potential employee is?

So how does it look if that person comes across as vivacious, bubbly outgoing and friendly – then on Facebook either has but 3 friends and enjoys collecting rare and unused stamps? The reflection of that persons social space – based on the bias of the employers own perception of that person based on some social media output. Notice so far I’ve not mentioned anything about the persons ability or experience as I assume these are already a given since that person attended an interview. Everyone is always interested and some what a voyeur aspect – why would so many follow Jonathan Ross or Stephen Fry on Twitter if they weren't so voyeuristic in knowing what these people are doing in their daily lives – just he same as you and me but because its them there is that fascination. They would never add their Twitter followers onto their Facebook or add them into their iPhone address book – so to them its a good ego boost as well as self promotion – more importantly its just great fun!!

Back to the example above and then pushing this a little further – what is the correct etiquette for social media and current or potential employees and employers? I mentioned a potential situation above, that has been raised on numerous occasions even to the point that the employer found it appropriate to mention an individual who in his interview said that he was very active in social media and had hundreds of friends on his MySpace and Facebook accounts – only for the employee to check – saw that he had but 6 and they were his family and nothing more. The guy never got the job, branded a bulls****er and then, thanks to the stupid employer, went round the web as one of those “funny Facebook stories” that showed the guy had no friends and only family and didn't actually do anything even though he claimed to be a massive influencer. The result was classic – he was a prolific user, influencer and had 1,347 friends and ran groups – however his account that the employer found was for the purpose of his family only – to chat and find out the goings on within the family unit – his real account he protected himself with an ALIAS that backfired on the employer – and a million dollar suit for the employer followed…

So here we stand on this abyss of being swamped within social media and information is everywhere – which is fantastic and scary. I was prompted to write this after reading a post by Len Devanna who asks the question “Blurring the lines of life & work” – however that is not quite the case.

If it were as easy as that then the blurred lines would or could be disassociated. Len is a blogger, twitterer and is Director of Web Strategy for EMC. However It’s what information you put out there, where and under what guise? Len talked about two “fictitious” scenarios about a client which was a good read - Len then finished off by saying “So where are the lines? Do we need lines? Am I over analyzing this? Do I, as an individual, have every right to say what's on my mind regardless of the possible ramifications? Or is the conservative approach the right one?” But using Len’s example and his twitter account – lets say he had a meeting with FOX to do some web strategy around Family Guy – but using Len’s example in his post we find that in one of Len’s tweets he said “1st season of Survivor was mildly fun.. Then downhill. Bachelor, Biggest Loser - It's all part of FOX's plan to take over the world." Fox could if they used that example – as a slant against FOX and their global strategy!

I would say not and Len is entitled to voice his concern / opinion / comment to his hearts content – but as he is using his name, and linked to EMC you could say that there is a link – no matter what disclaimers say – but that is the points isn’t it?

Google have finished the work that is bringing the tweets from Twitter to the fore and delivering the entire 140char text – which means all those ramblings, drunken tweets, and offensive backlash items will be there for the Googling world to see – link that back to your work and you have an issue…

So perhaps the way forward is for work – create your own work persona – talk, discuss, blog, share and tweet about specific elements and challenges that you face. Have an alias where you can have the mundane and celebrity following to see if @stephenfry will upset anyone today – and if your going to post pictures of your stag night with a bevy of topless dancers – then expect your future wife, mum, employer to be having a quiet word in your shell like…